@cryptokevo @kitty_smooches @Covid_Vax_ @pjselby01 I mean, I'm not rolling with all that's being said above, but I got it from here - https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@abikhalil_t SARS CoV & MERS vaxes *were* developed over 20 years and *were* known to be unsafe for human clinical trials. From Dec 2020 - https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@FillmoreWhite @Colin1011010 @hugh_mankind @fedeperez19 I can show you what was known before the vax release based on wildly sub-standard human clinical trials? https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@Y2K_r_Ashman @Voxclamantis7 @SydneyLWatson ? It's true. That's why they've been working on SARS CoV vaxes for 20 years. Miserably, I might add. No good for human clinical trials until just now apparently. Or what passes for human clinical trials now. h
@SSymles @MediocreSix @BigMal84 @mattyxlp The book of reality: https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@thereal_truther Give this a moment some time if you will. Published December 2020. https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@kerivvy @georgecardaus @AdamBandt Gosh, who would have guessed these vaxes would likely turn out to be duds for immunity. https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@middle_tax @clobtrap @PeterSweden7 Published December 2020. Also not just mRNA. https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@callanswag2 @Crowsy @StrangersSpidey @disclosetv Published: 20 December 2020 https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@DigitalSignalS1 @Just_Rad @AdamBandt cOnSpiRacY thEoriEs oN tHe ToiLet rEseaRch. https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@ratmanbeef @Hypothesis @scientist_pop @Maelil5 @Sc_ott @DFla56 @London_gooner @DrAseemMalhotra Nonsense… this is how it was done…https://t.co/mwUNtM46WW https://t.co/ZIf51mA8kz
@littlequackling Yes mate. The Science also *actually* said bad outcomes was likely to be the case before those 5 minute absurdly sub-standard trials. They hadn't sorted those things in 20 years of trying already. https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@The1stMrsO @VikiLovesFACS What about this research information. You can see the inical trials for all CoVs. What about hiv/rsv/maleria vaccines? https://t.co/4bsQR0FtTL
@The1stMrsO @VikiLovesFACS Ah you have read the studies? Off course not🤦♀️ https://t.co/uULX8fQaQ5
@The1stMrsO @VikiLovesFACS Various forms of vaccines targeting SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV have been developed and tested in preclinical models clinical lessons learned from SARS-CoV &MERS-CoV researches together with vaccine development experience gained fr
@smithy7773 @thenaj17 @PoliticalGraham @JamesMelville As I was eating I wanted to check something else and lo and behold: "Although our understanding of pathogenic CoVs has been steadily accumulating for about two decades, no effective vaccine has yet been
@matthazolam @debrashaw73 Coronavirus vaccines and mRNA vaccines have been in development for years. https://t.co/StFiZDPtvy I think its prudent to start working on protection against novel pathogens as soon as they are identified.
@SubinthePub @kitkatppk @newscomauHQ @Joe_Hildebrand And like regulatory capture and such isn't a *well* known issue. At least it was in 2019. Also I'm not right wing, let alone Qanon whatever bullshit being pedalled relentlessly to ridicule and ostracize
@Niner4Life_IDC @Keef2101 @david_r_morgan @thezenofzero Take a look for yourself. Pay *particular* attention to known complications. Fkd if I'm banking on a clinical trial phase that would usually take ~10 years compressed down into months and calling it
@bluesofie171 @Cernovich This is an interesting, but long read that gives further information https://t.co/lc6fyCyaQS
@ScrewMorrison @govt_corrupt Here's a good summary on vaccines that had failed to meet the safety criteria for human clinical trials until *just now*. Go on. Have a read. About the known complications they were hoping to sort out *just now*. https://t.co/
@walkawayAUS @Leo_Puglisi6 @SovCit13 Personally, this is the sort of research *I* did 'on the toilet'. https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@JuddLegum And you fucks RAIL us all as wak af conspiracy jobs. Well fuck you. WE read science. ESPECIALLY when there is no ACTUAL informed CONSENT. https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@TheMightyChin1 @lenlayton @AndrewLawton Take a look for yourself. Maybe you're convinced those wildly sub standard trials gave an all clear but I have no reason to think so. https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@PatOksu02 @KTBug2792 @kylamb8 Along with other things, I took this in and decided hell no to an experimental vaccine given I'm not in a high risk cohort. https://t.co/dDYMfd70x4
@EoboOboe @Grinning_Coyote @jakeshieldsajj @joshtpm I did my own research. Well, I shouldn't take the credit really. What would usually take 10-15 years in human clinical trials reduced down to 5 minutes you say? Hard pass for me. https://t.co/dDYMfdo3z4
@Sir_Keef @bulkbiker @Kevin88129413 @alanvibe @tregorann @DrAseemMalhotra @MarkSteynOnline @GBNEWS There are many reasons that they were developed quickly. One being the amount of worldwide resources thrown at them. Yes, scientists had been previously work
@SarcasmStardust Especially when they knew the issues that would result in 'not as advertised' were very likely pre atrociously sub-standard human clinical trials. Which is by no means all that is concerning there... Oops, I dropped something. https://t.
@BravoCTZ @Ted_Howze @thebradfordfile Feel free to give this a read and then tell me your 5 minute wonder trial was sufficient. https://t.co/dDYMfdo3z4
@ValentineJoyce8 @jay10443 @planet_tenant @HeatheryDoune "There are also immunopathological complications associated with the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccines that require addressing and further optimization. One adverse effect is the induction of antibody-d
@Rational_Taught @nk6nk @KenBerhan "There are also immunopathological complications associated with the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccines that require addressing and further optimization. One adverse effect is the induction of antibody-dependent enhancement (
@dksdata @AcmeHealth I reckon this is an interesting summary and reason to steer clear of apparent verification from a wildly sub-standard human clinical trial process. https://t.co/dDYMfdo3z4
@Lord_Bogan @BradJamin3 Feel free to go research this on the toilet. Scroll down to: "There are also immunopathological complications associated with the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccines that require addressing and further optimization" - 2020 And stfu.
@feltiae @robbot4000 @chrismartenson I've found it hard to research what was known about this as the term "coronavirus" has been coopted to refer specifically to SARS-CoV-2. However, I did find https://t.co/yLhgALTdBX from 2020 which suggests that going a
@PeterPan1177 @caitoz Or proving they were solved, that is. Hard pass for me frankly. https://t.co/dDYMfdo3z4
@LisaPatrEvans @StrayWookie @LtHarker @TDOlverson @mcberkman "There are also immunopathological complications associated with the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccines that require addressing and further optimization. One adverse effect is the induction of antibo
@MaryanneDemasi @EMA_News "There are also immunopathological complications associated with the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccines that require addressing and further optimization. One adverse effect is the induction of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)" -
@R1lesDavis @LClaw85 @AdmetosL @Beach_Bummr @Trampfast2go @Randall87454048 @ManoGov It's nigh impossible. You can whip out something like this - https://t.co/dDYMfdo3z4
@JacobCleary18 @louisembrookes @PBC174 @Resist2Exist313 Neither do I, but I do know a lot is being obscured and that does not bode well at all. If you check out earlier documentation on SARS CoV or MERS it will also outline labs leaks and potential weaponi
@Seanpat99 @RepThomasMassie This is from an article from December 2020. The remarks below are in the conclusion: https://t.co/lc6fyCyaQS "Fortunately, the biological and clinical lessons we learned from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV researches, together with th
@JackJohnson9797 @called2serve249 @thechuckgettemy @Nick_Kupper @TuckerCarlson Here's a real source for you son: https://t.co/lKosiCC5pF
@MartinSthilair1 @AlexeyZiskin @Chris_69111 @sante_qc Aucun candidat vaccin MERS ou SARS Cov 1 n'étais a base ARNm. Aucun n'a passé le stage Phase I. Au plus Phase II recrutement mais abandonné. https://t.co/nDARhCGxC6
@JessMar57654996 https://t.co/tqRURLwvdY Quite a long time actually.....
@GimmeGabagool @summerfloatin @jordanbpeterson Very misleading. These are the first messenger RNA vaccines to be produced and tested in large-scale phase III human trials. "No mRNA studies for SARS and MERS in the last two decades" https://t.co/2MEPsunbOL
@tony_vandongen December 2020: "no RNA vaccine studies for SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV in the past two decades". They weren't even trying it on SARS or MERS. What coronavirus did they have in mind in 2019? 🤔 https://t.co/TI6H19rOcZ
Dec 2020: "Although there were no RNA vaccine studies for SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV in the past two decades, there have already been 6 novel RNA vaccines reaching clinical trials for SARS-CoV-2 since the outbreak of COVID-19". Isn't that just weird? 1/2 https:/
@MrGlass61145253 @theMFMF @diggingupweeds @kaizyaa Since the discovery in the 1960's .. that's way more than 17 years. Educate yourself. https://t.co/ZrAhGOKgTX https://t.co/tELw7fxOBd
@phoaddict71 @theMFMF @diggingupweeds @kaizyaa Here..why don't YOU do a little bit of reading. 🙄 Cause this is where I get my info from. Valid sources. https://t.co/ZrAhGOKgTX
@MrGlass61145253 @theMFMF @diggingupweeds @kaizyaa Since the discovery in the 1960's .. that's way more than 17 years. Educate yourself. https://t.co/ZrAhGOKgTX https://t.co/X8QgCZbrVT
@Canavakia @VPrasadMDMPH This from 2020 discusses vaccine options, status and variety. The footnotes and references outline in useful detail what was known going back a very long time and why these vaccines could be delivered so quickly. (Lots of homework
@breakfast_dogs OK, what about this: CG and CpG depleted SARS-like backbone + passaged RBD + Human codon-optimized MERS FCS = Pan-Coronavirus LAV ? https://t.co/eic8evGqD5
@dervish2525 @newday2020sc @Sea_hag_ @Teagy63 @jesflres Here’s a journal article from 12/2020 that reviews the research into vaccines for similar viruses, and how those experiments gave scientists a head start on Covid vaccines: https://t.co/iXRtWlV17s
@kittyhundal That’s about four different SARS vaccine candidates, none mRNA based, and it’s from a decade ago. Work on the original SARS vaccine stopped because it wasn’t needed, but gave researchers a head start when it came to SARS-CoV-2. More recent stu
@TruthOuter Extensive research was already completed with mRNA vaccines for similar infectious diseases prior to the outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic: https://t.co/Bk1W4aAAEJ https://t.co/pyiC5VFXbL https://t.co/qS0z0rmymL
@Docpru8 @Flyingdog5000 @Chrs0srhC @AndrewRoseSC The COVID vaccine has been in research for years.They only tweaked it for COVID-19. I suggest you simply skip down to the references and see that some of them are from the early to middle 2000's. You're wel
@MikeK634 @TheNBACentral i shouldn't engage, but here we go: coronavirus is a species of virus which has been around for ages. an "established body of knowledge about coronaviruses" existed prior to covid-19 (source: https://t.co/ZG8MBEaEwe)(the "19" is l
@JT_Grindrod @evogenome Huh, I hadn't realized there was an issue with ADE in some of the preliminary SARS-CoV-1 vaccines, particularly the attenuated live-virus one. It sounds like more promising vaccine candidates focused solely on the RBD were in the wo
@MikkoKorhonen12 @suojelusprkl Höpö höpö. Yksikään mRNA-injektio ei ollut testauksessa MERSin aikana. Höpönassu. https://t.co/mvOIEeNCbF https://t.co/aTdDuMxel0
Good read,, an explanation on how the Covid vaccine came from 80s and 90s vaccines for other known viruses, Coronavirus vaccine development: from SARS and MERS to COVID-19 https://t.co/iV0m6MrWDg
@PrettyF1acko @pitter_patter77 @whoisvanblue @JayVXVALBTQNT @Stephmiccy I’ll leave you with this as to how we got to where we are. Traditional vaccines are old and the live attenuated versions are only used if the other versions arent viable. https://t.c
@SimsTazmon @mindblowingpo https://t.co/AdKLMlUvUn. They can't work on both at the same time? ...okkkk
@JB_Hilterman @SpEaKeASy896 @thierrybaudet @dancalegria @fvdemocratie @rudybouma @Lareb_NL @ministerVWS Bij Polio was ook de Cutter schandaal waar velen dood gingen. Daarna zijn de vaccins verfijnd en veiligheidsprotocollen opgesteld. Ik ben 2x gevaccineer
RT @ARMY_HTP: Fonte: https://t.co/dCNuzu5UKv Tem mais perguntas? No nosso site temos mais informações :) ⬇️ https://t.co/zUb00wFUYS
RT @ARMY_HTP: Fonte: https://t.co/dCNuzu5UKv Tem mais perguntas? No nosso site temos mais informações :) ⬇️ https://t.co/zUb00wFUYS
RT @ARMY_HTP: Fonte: https://t.co/dCNuzu5UKv Tem mais perguntas? No nosso site temos mais informações :) ⬇️ https://t.co/zUb00wFUYS
Fonte: https://t.co/dCNuzu5UKv Tem mais perguntas? No nosso site temos mais informações :) ⬇️ https://t.co/zUb00wFUYS
@conflict1904 @__Sense__ @Mitch_Cumstein_ @SamHarrisOrg COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are essentially the same as the SARS and MERS mRNA vaccines (only sequenced for COVID-19 proteins) which have long term data. Lots of studies (animal and human): https://t.co/
@mkeulemans @Diana_peinst Raar. “ Although there were no RNA vaccine studies for SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV in the past two decades,” https://t.co/KeQksrX7gr
@ActionDanCpfc @manugevych Can you find animal trial information on the yearly flu vaccine? Here is a study of the trial information though (from phase 2/3), since you really want it: https://t.co/vyUOt8wDnk Here's one with links to the trials completed
RT @iplantfield: https://t.co/OvCLF7WWZg Coronavirus vaccine development: from SARS and MERS to COVID-19 #2022_عام_الملاحقة_القانونية افهم…
https://t.co/OvCLF7WWZg Coronavirus vaccine development: from SARS and MERS to COVID-19 #2022_عام_الملاحقة_القانونية افهم يا🙄 #دعوى_أهلية_جماعية #نريد_المساجد_بلا_تباعد #الإرهاب_الطبي #أطفالنا_خط_أحمر https://t.co/hJXXIBSVe9
@iowa_josh @ellymelly @LibDemAus haha? The first lethal coronavirus SARS-CoV emerged in 2002. 2002 to 2021 = years ( > year ) https://t.co/8qylcFGQ7B
@KenMwanaMukongo Não nego que isso seja verdade, mas este tipo de vacinas tem estado a ser estudado há muito tempo. Já houve um SARS-Cov 1 em 2002 (taxa mort 10%) e o MERS em 2012 (tx. mort 35%). Mais pode ser encontrado aqui: https://t.co/vhB3aApInz
@DDatart @DameronTrish @TheSalonniere @ScienceWDrDoug This study discusses the “immunopathological complications”with past SARS vaccines. https://t.co/5PrinfxHsr
@clibertas1 @GlennYoungkin https://t.co/I1I72Ss8c7 https://t.co/MVkzqKAYwz https://t.co/DJkK11utqO Research for coronavirus' has been ongoing for decades. Be skeptical about the vaccine. But then be skeptical about every other treatment suggested to you
@sfagen08 @mallondavid1 @KasperKepp @teija_korhonen @BallouxFrancois Oops-actually this is probably the best for you: pros and cons of each vaccine technology re MERS & SARS. https://t.co/yxhVjuqBVW
@merlyntje @hermanteethrot @telegraaf @SignaalWaarde We waren dicht bij vaccins tegen andere Corona virussen. ‘Helaas’ doofden SARS en MERS uit waardoor het geld voor de stappen tot approval niet werd toegekend. Als dat wel was gebeurd, hadden we maanden
@____Mr_J____ @BeenWronged @EsquireErrant @CondenserMick Just SARS and MERS - which had effectively shared considerations as covid-19. https://t.co/tkbuhE80QQ
@rraoind @IrrigationJims @OzraeliAvi Let me know which parts are too technical and I'll try and dumb it down for you. https://t.co/fgLaaQ4IQw
@girlnasty22 Coronavirus vaccines were in development prior to the pandemic. Because of SARS. https://t.co/iSNpxX036K
@irado35 @laurar69_ @blazedluc @fabianoamg @luizacaires3 @JanainaDoBrasil @AnarodriguesMA @LuGamoradecor 2003 https://t.co/GdI5UgGtZb 2016 (RNA + coronavírus, o mundo sempre esteve um pouco atendo a chance de uma "SARS" voltar) https://t.co/gFu6OTEVXO 20
RT @QuirkyInuk: @BullChain You’re conveniently omitting the fact that the COVID-19 vaccines were built on previous research done when devel…
RT @QuirkyInuk: @BullChain You’re conveniently omitting the fact that the COVID-19 vaccines were built on previous research done when devel…