↓ Skip to main content

Health workforce skill mix and task shifting in low income countries: a review of recent evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
397 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
706 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health workforce skill mix and task shifting in low income countries: a review of recent evidence
Published in
Human Resources for Health, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-9-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brent D Fulton, Richard M Scheffler, Susan P Sparkes, Erica Yoonkyung Auh, Marko Vujicic, Agnes Soucat

Abstract

Health workforce needs-based shortages and skill mix imbalances are significant health workforce challenges. Task shifting, defined as delegating tasks to existing or new cadres with either less training or narrowly tailored training, is a potential strategy to address these challenges. This study uses an economics perspective to review the skill mix literature to determine its strength of the evidence, identify gaps in the evidence, and to propose a research agenda.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 706 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 3 <1%
Ghana 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Nigeria 2 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 676 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 146 21%
Researcher 107 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 10%
Student > Postgraduate 59 8%
Other 40 6%
Other 162 23%
Unknown 120 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 230 33%
Social Sciences 99 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 94 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 24 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 21 3%
Other 91 13%
Unknown 147 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,811,921
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#169
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,659
of 192,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them