↓ Skip to main content

Effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-12-81
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seval Kul, Antonella Barbieri, Erika Milan, Ilke Montag, Kris Vanhaecht, Massimiliano Panella

Abstract

Care pathways have become a popular tool to enhance the quality of care by improving patient outcomes, promoting patient safety, increasing patient satisfaction, and optimizing the use of resources. We performed a disease specific systematic review to determine how care pathways in the hospital treatment of heart failure affect in-hospital mortality, length of in-hospital stay, readmission rate and hospitalisation cost when compared with standard care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Computer Science 4 5%
Decision Sciences 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 22 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2012.
All research outputs
#14,607,238
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#719
of 1,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,874
of 171,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,589 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.