↓ Skip to main content

The influence of context and process when implementing e-health

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of context and process when implementing e-health
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-9-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Boddy, Gerry King, Julia S Clark, David Heaney, Frances Mair

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 3%
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 122 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 29 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 15 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2014.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#846
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,212
of 191,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.