↓ Skip to main content

Application of Glutamine-enriched nutrition therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of Glutamine-enriched nutrition therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Published in
Nutrition Journal, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12937-016-0187-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yueqin Han, Fengzhi Zhang, Jinshen Wang, Yanping Zhu, Jianhua Dai, Yueqing Bu, Qiaozhi Yang, Yingying Xiao, Xiaojing Sun

Abstract

We investigated the effects of glutamine (Gln)-enriched nutritional therapy during chemotherapy on the nutritional status and immune function of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We enrolled 48 children who were newly diagnosed with ALL in our department during the period of 2013.1-2014.12. The patients (follow random number table) were randomly divided into the control group (peptamen) and the treatment group (peptamen + glutamine), 24 cases in each group. The remission induction regimens were all based on VDLP (D) chemotherapy (VCR (Vincrisstine), DNR (Daunomycin), L-ASP (L-Asparagiase), Prednisolone and Dexamethasone). The treatment group received Gln-enriched nutritional therapy every day during the full course of chemotherapy,and the control group is as same as the treatment group except without glutamine. The indicators of general nutritional status, such as weight, height, and triceps skinfold thickness, and the indicators of biochemical tests, such as serum albumin, prealbumin, creatinine-height index, retinol binding protein, and urinary hydroxyproline index, were compared between the two groups at the end of the first, second, third and the fourth week when the chemotherapy was completed. And in the fourth week, flow cytometry was applied to detect the levels of T cell subsets and the activities of natural killer (NK) cells in peripheral blood of the two groups. 1. after 4 weeks nutritional therapy, there is no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two groups of children in weight, height and other indicators. 2. At the end of 2 weeks treatment, the level of prealbumin (PA) and retinol-binding protein (RBP) is higher in treatment group than that in the control group (P <0.05), at the end of 3 weeks treatment, the thickness of triceps skinfold is higher (P <0.05) than that in the control group; 3. At the end of 3 and 4 weeks, the concentrations serum ALB, PA, RBP and UHI were higher than in the control group (P <0.05); 4. There is statistically significant (p < 0.05) between the two groups in edema incidence; 5. At the end of treatment (4 weeks), the percentages of CD3 +, CD4 +, CD4 +/CD8 +, NK cell are significantly decreased in the two groups (P <0.05). Gln-enriched nutritional therapy can effectively improve the systemic nutritional status of children with leukemia, improve immune function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 10 8%
Student > Master 9 7%
Lecturer 6 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 55 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Unspecified 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 56 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,486,067
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#931
of 1,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,413
of 354,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.