| Title |
Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound for COVID-19 (PoCUS4COVID): international expert consensus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03369-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arif Hussain, Gabriele Via, Lawrence Melniker, Alberto Goffi, Guido Tavazzi, Luca Neri, Tomas Villen, Richard Hoppmann, Francesco Mojoli, Vicki Noble, Laurent Zieleskiewicz, Pablo Blanco, Irene W. Y. Ma, Mahathar Abd. Wahab, Abdulmohsen Alsaawi, Majid Al Salamah, Martin Balik, Diego Barca, Karim Bendjelid, Belaid Bouhemad, Pablo Bravo-Figueroa, Raoul Breitkreutz, Juan Calderon, Jim Connolly, Roberto Copetti, Francesco Corradi, Anthony J. Dean, André Denault, Deepak Govil, Carmela Graci, Young-Rock Ha, Laura Hurtado, Toru Kameda, Michael Lanspa, Christian B. Laursen, Francis Lee, Rachel Liu, Massimiliano Meineri, Miguel Montorfano, Peiman Nazerian, Bret P. Nelson, Aleksandar N. Neskovic, Ramon Nogue, Adi Osman, José Pazeli, Elmo Pereira-Junior, Tomislav Petrovic, Emanuele Pivetta, Jan Poelaert, Susanna Price, Gregor Prosen, Shalim Rodriguez, Philippe Rola, Colin Royse, Yale Tung Chen, Mike Wells, Adrian Wong, Wang Xiaoting, Wang Zhen, Yaseen Arabi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 291 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 39 | 13% |
| Spain | 36 | 12% |
| Mexico | 13 | 4% |
| Canada | 13 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 3% |
| Turkey | 6 | 2% |
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 2% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 118 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 211 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 47 | 16% |
| Scientists | 25 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 257 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 23% |
| Unknown | 87 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 98 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 193. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#209,255
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#88
of 6,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,026
of 529,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.