You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does comorbidity explain the ethnic inequalities in cervical cancer survival in New Zealand? A retrospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-132 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naomi Brewer, Barry Borman, Diana Sarfati, Mona Jeffreys, Steven T Fleming, Soo Cheng, Neil Pearce |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Librarian | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 26% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 41% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,384,091
of 25,055,009 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,880
of 8,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,486
of 114,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#30
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,055,009 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,859 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.