You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RELATCH: relative optimality in metabolic networks explains robust metabolic and regulatory responses to perturbations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2012-13-9-r78 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joonhoon Kim, Jennifer L Reed |
| Abstract |
Predicting cellular responses to perturbations is an important task in systems biology. We report a new approach, RELATCH, which uses flux and gene expression data from a reference state to predict metabolic responses in a genetically or environmentally perturbed state. Using the concept of relative optimality, which considers relative flux changes from a reference state, we hypothesize a relative metabolic flux pattern is maintained from one state to another, and that cells adapt to perturbations using metabolic and regulatory reprogramming to preserve this relative flux pattern. This constraint-based approach will have broad utility where predictions of metabolic responses are needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 35% |
| Researcher | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 33% |
| Engineering | 29 | 18% |
| Chemical Engineering | 19 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,495,301
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,104
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,620
of 190,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#36
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.