↓ Skip to main content

Prioritising neonatal medicines research: UK Medicines for Children Research Network scoping survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prioritising neonatal medicines research: UK Medicines for Children Research Network scoping survey
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-9-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark A Turner, Sara Lewis, Daniel B Hawcutt, D Field

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,486,067
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,376
of 3,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,649
of 111,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them