↓ Skip to main content

Prioritising neonatal medicines research: UK Medicines for Children Research Network scoping survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prioritising neonatal medicines research: UK Medicines for Children Research Network scoping survey
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-9-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark A Turner, Sara Lewis, Daniel B Hawcutt, D Field

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#5,607,547
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,009
of 2,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,645
of 265,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them