↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the role of environmental variables on the population dynamics of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling the role of environmental variables on the population dynamics of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto
Published in
Malaria Journal, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul E Parham, Diane Pople, Céline Christiansen-Jucht, Steve Lindsay, Wes Hinsley, Edwin Michael

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Senegal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 137 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 21%
Researcher 28 19%
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 10 7%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 33%
Environmental Science 21 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 13%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Mathematics 6 4%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 18 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,849,839
of 14,123,515 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,102
of 4,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,901
of 259,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,123,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them