You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of a family-centered psychosocial-based nutrition intervention in patients with advanced cancer: the PiCNIC2 pilot randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00657-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex Molassiotis, Teresa Brown, Hui Lin Cheng, Angela Byrnes, Raymond Javan Chan, David Wyld, Melissa Eastgate, Patsy Yates, Andrea P Marshall, Rebecca Fichera, Liz Isenring, Ki Fung To, Po Shan Ko, Wang Lam, Yuk Fong Lam, Lai Fan Au, Raymond See-kit Lo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Belgium | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 73 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Psychology | 9 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 75 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,260,412
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#645
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,936
of 502,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.