You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Monpa, memory, and change: an ethnobotanical study of plant use in Mêdog County, South-east Tibet, China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13002-020-0355-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shan Li, Yu Zhang, Yongjie Guo, Lixin Yang, Yuhua Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 43 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,682,308
of 23,377,816 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#327
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,958
of 453,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.