↓ Skip to main content

The Hip Fracture Surgery in Elderly Patients (HIPELD) study: protocol for a randomized, multicenter controlled trial evaluating the effect of xenon on postoperative delirium in older patients…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Hip Fracture Surgery in Elderly Patients (HIPELD) study: protocol for a randomized, multicenter controlled trial evaluating the effect of xenon on postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery
Published in
Trials, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Coburn, Robert D Sanders, Mervyn Maze, Rolf Rossaint

Abstract

Strategies to protect the brain from postoperative delirium (POD) after hip fracture are urgently needed. The development of delirium often is associated with the loss of independence, poor functional recovery, and increased morbidity, as well as increases in length of hospital stay, discharges to nursing facilities, and healthcare costs. We hypothesize that xenon may reduce the burden of POD, (i) by avoiding the need to provide anesthesia with a drug that targets the γ-amino-butyric acid (GABA)A receptor and (ii) through beneficial anesthetic and organ-protective effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Unknown 104 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 28 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 31 29%