You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-1-43 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer M Tetzlaff, An-Wen Chan, Jessica Kitchen, Margaret Sampson, Andrea C Tricco, David Moher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Singapore | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 29% |
| Unknown | 33 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 13% |
| Psychology | 20 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 45 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,280,488
of 25,035,235 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,018
of 2,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,376
of 178,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,035,235 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.