You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Identification of key pathways and hub genes in the myogenic differentiation of pluripotent stem cell: a bioinformatics and experimental study
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2021
Wenyong Fei, Mingsheng Liu, Yao Zhang, Shichao Cao, Xuanqi Wang, Bin Xie, Jingcheng Wang
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||3||21%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||14%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||5||36%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||7%|
|Sports and Recreations||1||7%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 503,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.