You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
“A little (PPI) MAGIC can take you a long way” : involving children and young people in research from inception of a novel medical device to multi-centre clinical trial Roald Dahl, James and the Giant Peach (1961)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40900-020-00243-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nichola Abrehart, Kate Frost, Roy Harris, Andrew Wragg, Derek Stewart, Hayfa Sharif, Rachel Matthews, Luca Marciani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 21 | 57% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 70% |
Scientists | 6 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 14 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,297,647
of 24,363,506 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#105
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,982
of 512,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,363,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.