You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Evidence, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13750-020-00215-7 |
Authors |
Sini Savilaakso, Anna Johansson, Matti Häkkilä, Anne Uusitalo, Terhi Sandgren, Mikko Mönkkönen, Pasi Puttonen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 30 | 39% |
Sweden | 3 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 40 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 60 | 78% |
Scientists | 15 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 20 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 19% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 28 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#776,373
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#18
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,707
of 531,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them