You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of XELOX versus XELOX plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer in a public hospital school
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-017-3679-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Queiróz Ungari, Leonardo Régis Leira Pereira, Altacílio Aparecido Nunes, Fernanda Maris Peria |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,642,507
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,122
of 8,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,288
of 327,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#33
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,434 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.