You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors influencing the implementation of screening and brief interventions for alcohol use in primary care practices: a systematic review using the COM-B system and Theoretical Domains Framework
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-01073-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frederico Rosário, Maria Inês Santos, Kathryn Angus, Leo Pas, Cristina Ribeiro, Niamh Fitzgerald |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 48% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Portugal | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
Scientists | 5 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
Researcher | 13 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 45 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
Psychology | 13 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 47 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,917,260
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#362
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,176
of 526,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.