You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How effective are social norms interventions in changing the clinical behaviours of healthcare workers? A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-01072-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mei Yee Tang, Sarah Rhodes, Rachael Powell, Laura McGowan, Elizabeth Howarth, Benjamin Brown, Sarah Cotterill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 25% |
| United States | 6 | 15% |
| Ireland | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 43% |
| Scientists | 12 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
| Psychology | 10 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,595,257
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#281
of 1,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,344
of 520,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.