You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary patterns and chronic kidney disease risk: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of observational studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00661-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ling-Qiong He, Xu-Hong Wu, Yi-Qian Huang, Xiao-Yan Zhang, Long Shu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Greece | 1 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Belgium | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#13,208,098
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#988
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,365
of 502,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#19
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.