↓ Skip to main content

False negative rate of COVID-19 PCR testing: a discordant testing analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 3,424)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
187 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
False negative rate of COVID-19 PCR testing: a discordant testing analysis
Published in
Virology Journal, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12985-021-01489-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamil N. Kanji, Nathan Zelyas, Clayton MacDonald, Kanti Pabbaraju, Muhammad Naeem Khan, Abhaya Prasad, Jia Hu, Mathew Diggle, Byron M. Berenger, Graham Tipples

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 187 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 237 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 16%
Researcher 20 8%
Student > Master 20 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 84 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Engineering 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 90 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 460. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#60,458
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#7
of 3,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,895
of 529,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.