You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The use of mobile phones for the prevention and control of arboviral diseases: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-10126-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Angelica Carrillo, Axel Kroeger, Rocio Cardenas Sanchez, Sonia Diaz Monsalve, Silvia Runge-Ranzinger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 33% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 188 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 85 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 89 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,663,365
of 23,796,227 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,075
of 15,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,304
of 506,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#107
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,796,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.