↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Two Early Child Development Assessment Tools in Rural Limpopo, South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing Two Early Child Development Assessment Tools in Rural Limpopo, South Africa
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12887-020-02101-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gwyneth Milbrath, Claire Constance, Audrey Ogendi, James Plews-Ogan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 28 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Unspecified 6 10%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Psychology 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 30 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,664,272
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,093
of 3,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,851
of 383,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#68
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.