↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of percutaneous cross screw fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for pelvic Day type II crescent fracture-dislocation: case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of percutaneous cross screw fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for pelvic Day type II crescent fracture-dislocation: case-control study
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13018-020-02197-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guangheng Xiang, Xiaoyu Dong, Xingan Jiang, Leyi Cai, Jianshun Wang, Xiaoshan Guo, Jian Xiao, Yongzeng Feng

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Psychology 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,886,729
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#194
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,018
of 502,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#13
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.