↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the effects of introducing the CRISPR/Cas9 system by microinjection and electroporation into porcine embryos at different stages

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the effects of introducing the CRISPR/Cas9 system by microinjection and electroporation into porcine embryos at different stages
Published in
BMC Research Notes, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13104-020-05412-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quynh Anh Le, Fuminori Tanihara, Manita Wittayarat, Zhao Namula, Yoko Sato, Qingyi Lin, Koki Takebayashi, Maki Hirata, Takeshige Otoi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 14 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#20,679,788
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,593
of 4,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#429,607
of 503,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#45
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.