↓ Skip to main content

Left and right ventricular longitudinal strains are associated with poor outcome in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Left and right ventricular longitudinal strains are associated with poor outcome in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40560-020-00519-3
Authors

Arief Wibowo, Raymond Pranata, Astri Astuti, Badai Bhatara Tiksnadi, Erwan Martanto, Januar Wibawa Martha, Augustine Purnomowati, Mohammad Rizki Akbar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 42%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 18 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,448,589
of 20,185,820 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#206
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,444
of 474,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#38
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,185,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.