↓ Skip to main content

Left and right ventricular longitudinal strains are associated with poor outcome in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Left and right ventricular longitudinal strains are associated with poor outcome in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40560-020-00519-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arief Wibowo, Raymond Pranata, Astri Astuti, Badai Bhatara Tiksnadi, Erwan Martanto, Januar Wibawa Martha, Augustine Purnomowati, Mohammad Rizki Akbar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 23 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 39%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 25 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,814,078
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#260
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,953
of 503,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.