You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Informing the research agenda for optimizing audit and feedback interventions: results of a prioritization exercise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01195-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heather L. Colquhoun, Kelly Carroll, Kevin W. Eva, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Noah Ivers, Susan Michie, Jamie C. Brehaut |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 26% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
| Scientists | 8 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,887,963
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#450
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,497
of 505,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#14
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.