You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of having natural teeth on the QoL of frail dentulous older people. A qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-839 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dominique Niesten, Krista van Mourik, Wil van der Sanden |
| Abstract |
In order to adapt oral care and treatment to the demands of the growing group of frail dentulous older people, it is important to understand how and to which extent having natural teeth contributes to the quality of life (QoL) of frail older people and how frailty influences their perspective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Psychology | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2012.
All research outputs
#13,368,181
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,467
of 14,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,356
of 172,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#168
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.