↓ Skip to main content

Factors that influence adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors that influence adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines: a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01577-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Hassan, Vincent Chan, Julie Stevens, Ieva Stupans

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Psychology 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,369,613
of 20,083,595 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#694
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,905
of 405,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,083,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them