You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determinants of using children’s mental health research in policymaking: variation by type of research use and phase of policy process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-021-01081-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Purtle, Katherine L. Nelson, Sarah Mc Cue Horwitz, Mary M. McKay, Kimberly E. Hoagwood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,357,112
of 23,706,541 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#710
of 1,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,363
of 505,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,706,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.