You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Simulation-based team training in time-critical clinical presentations in emergency medicine and critical care: a review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-021-00154-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jesper Weile, Mette Amalie Nebsbjerg, Stig Holm Ovesen, Charlotte Paltved, Mads Lind Ingeman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 18% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,225,248
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#104
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,725
of 503,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.