↓ Skip to main content

Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynette L Craft, Theodore W Zderic, Susan M Gapstur, Erik H VanIterson, Danielle M Thomas, Juned Siddique, Marc T Hamilton

Abstract

The inactivity physiology paradigm proposes that sedentary behaviors, including sitting too much, are independent of the type of physical activity delineated for health in the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Thus, we hypothesized that, when accounting for behaviors across the entire day, variability in the amount of time spent sitting would be independent of the inter-and intra-individual time engaged in sustained moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 128 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Student > Master 21 16%
Researcher 19 14%
Professor 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 21%
Sports and Recreations 23 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 8 6%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 30 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2018.
All research outputs
#612,520
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#180
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,275
of 191,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.