↓ Skip to main content

Choosing interventions to eliminate forest malaria: preliminary results of two operational research studies inside Cambodian forests

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Choosing interventions to eliminate forest malaria: preliminary results of two operational research studies inside Cambodian forests
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12936-020-03572-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amber Kunkel, Chea Nguon, Sophea Iv, Srean Chhim, Dom Peov, Phanith Kong, Saorin Kim, Sarun Im, Mark Debackere, Nimol Khim, Jean Popovici, Sreynet Srun, Amélie Vantaux, Jean-Olivier Guintran, Benoit Witkowski, Patrice Piola

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 13 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,020,762
of 20,150,223 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,054
of 5,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,470
of 409,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,150,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.