↓ Skip to main content

Choosing interventions to eliminate forest malaria: preliminary results of two operational research studies inside Cambodian forests

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Choosing interventions to eliminate forest malaria: preliminary results of two operational research studies inside Cambodian forests
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12936-020-03572-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amber Kunkel, Chea Nguon, Sophea Iv, Srean Chhim, Dom Peov, Phanith Kong, Saorin Kim, Sarun Im, Mark Debackere, Nimol Khim, Jean Popovici, Sreynet Srun, Amélie Vantaux, Jean-Olivier Guintran, Benoit Witkowski, Patrice Piola

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 6 15%
Lecturer 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Design 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 17 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,412,837
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,017
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,710
of 514,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#49
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.