You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
HIV prevention research and COVID-19: putting ethics guidance to the test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-021-00575-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stuart Rennie, Wairimu Chege, Leah A. Schrumpf, Florencia Luna, Robert Klitzman, Ernest Moseki, Brandon Brown, Steven Wakefield, Jeremy Sugarman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Czechia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Librarian | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,295,168
of 24,589,002 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#229
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,159
of 516,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,589,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.