You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bedside POCUS during ward emergencies is associated with improved diagnosis and outcome: an observational, prospective, controlled study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03466-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent Zieleskiewicz, Alexandre Lopez, Sami Hraiech, Karine Baumstarck, Bruno Pastene, Mathieu Di Bisceglie, Benjamin Coiffard, Gary Duclos, Alain Boussuges, Xavier Bobbia, Sharon Einav, Laurent Papazian, Marc Leone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 665 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 70 | 11% |
| United States | 49 | 7% |
| Spain | 47 | 7% |
| Colombia | 23 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 15 | 2% |
| Canada | 13 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 12 | 2% |
| Argentina | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 131 | 20% |
| Unknown | 273 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 542 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 91 | 14% |
| Scientists | 22 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 22% |
| Unknown | 48 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 431. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#67,377
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#15
of 6,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,152
of 535,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#2
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 535,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.