You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mitochondrial dysfunction associated with increased oxidative stress and α-synuclein accumulation in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons and postmortem brain tissue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Brain, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-6606-5-35 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoichi Imaizumi, Yohei Okada, Wado Akamatsu, Masato Koike, Naoko Kuzumaki, Hideki Hayakawa, Tomoko Nihira, Tetsuro Kobayashi, Manabu Ohyama, Shigeto Sato, Masashi Takanashi, Manabu Funayama, Akiyoshi Hirayama, Tomoyoshi Soga, Takako Hishiki, Makoto Suematsu, Takuya Yagi, Daisuke Ito, Arifumi Kosakai, Kozo Hayashi, Masanobu Shouji, Atsushi Nakanishi, Norihiro Suzuki, Yoshikuni Mizuno, Noboru Mizushima, Masayuki Amagai, Yasuo Uchiyama, Hideki Mochizuki, Nobutaka Hattori, Hideyuki Okano |
| Abstract |
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by selective degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (SN). The familial form of PD, PARK2, is caused by mutations in the parkin gene. parkin-knockout mouse models show some abnormalities, but they do not fully recapitulate the pathophysiology of human PARK2. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 304 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 22% |
| Researcher | 57 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 12% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 67 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Unknown | 54 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2012.
All research outputs
#2,745,948
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Brain
#120
of 1,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,770
of 172,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Brain
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.