↓ Skip to main content

Impact of early psychosocial factors (childhood socioeconomic factors and adversities) on future risk of type 2 diabetes, metabolic disturbances and obesity: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of early psychosocial factors (childhood socioeconomic factors and adversities) on future risk of type 2 diabetes, metabolic disturbances and obesity: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-525
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teresa Tamayo, Christian Herder, Wolfgang Rathmann

Abstract

Psychological factors and socioeconomic status (SES) have a notable impact on health disparities, including type 2 diabetes risk. However, the link between childhood psychosocial factors, such as childhood adversities or parental SES, and metabolic disturbances is less well established. In addition, the lifetime perspective including adult socioeconomic factors remains of further interest.We carried out a systematic review with the main question if there is evidence in population- or community-based studies that childhood adversities (like neglect, traumata and deprivation) have considerable impact on type 2 diabetes incidence and other metabolic disturbances. Also, parental SES was included in the search as risk factor for both, diabetes and adverse childhood experiences. Finally, we assumed that obesity might be a mediator for the association of childhood adversities with diabetes incidence. Therefore, we carried out a second review on obesity, applying a similar search strategy.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 324 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 15%
Researcher 45 13%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 9%
Other 65 19%
Unknown 44 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 30%
Social Sciences 52 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 12%
Psychology 36 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 66 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,597,113
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,530
of 14,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,557
of 94,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#25
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.