↓ Skip to main content

Clinical decision support must be useful, functional is not enough: a qualitative study of computer-based clinical decision support in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical decision support must be useful, functional is not enough: a qualitative study of computer-based clinical decision support in primary care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-349
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiina Kortteisto, Jorma Komulainen, Marjukka Mäkelä, Ilkka Kunnamo, Minna Kaila

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 98 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 27%
Computer Science 15 14%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 7%
Psychology 7 7%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,253,344
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,525
of 7,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,403
of 172,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#82
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.