You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01570-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte Paterson, Caleb Leduc, Margaret Maxwell, Birgit Aust, Benedikt L. Amann, Arlinda Cerga-Pashoja, Evelien Coppens, Chrisje Couwenbergh, Cliodhna O’Connor, Ella Arensman, Birgit A. Greiner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 21% |
| Ireland | 3 | 16% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Scientists | 5 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 88 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 96 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,479,566
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#424
of 2,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,241
of 517,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#10
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.