↓ Skip to main content

COVID-19: What we’ve done well and what we could or should have done better—the 4 Ps

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
58 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
COVID-19: What we’ve done well and what we could or should have done better—the 4 Ps
Published in
Critical Care, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13054-021-03467-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Louis Vincent, Julia Wendon, Greg S. Martin, Nicole P. Juffermans, Jacques Creteur, Maurizio Cecconi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Professor 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 27 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 33 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,335,854
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,143
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,741
of 525,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#38
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.