You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A fair and EMG-validated comparison of recruitment criteria, musculotendon models and muscle coordination strategies, for the inverse-dynamics based optimization of muscle forces during gait
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-021-00806-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florian Michaud, Mario Lamas, Urbano Lugrís, Javier Cuadrado |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 40 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 19 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Energy | 3 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 44 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#18,783,531
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1,005
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,507
of 505,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#34
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.