You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A rapid equity focused health impact assessment of a policy implementation plan: An Australian case study and impact evaluation
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-10-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ben F Harris-Roxas, Patrick J Harris, Elizabeth Harris, Lynn A Kemp |
Abstract |
Equity focused health impact assessments (EFHIAs), or health equity impact assessments, are being increasingly promoted internationally as a mechanism for enhancing the consideration of health equity in the development of policies, programs and projects. Despite this there are relatively few examples of examples of completed EFHIAs available. This paper presents a case study of a rapid EFHIA that was conducted in Australia on a health promotion policy implementation plan. It briefly describes the process and findings of the EFHIA and evaluates the impact on decision-making and implementation. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 90 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 20% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
Other | 22 | 23% |
Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 29 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2014.
All research outputs
#4,228,305
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#755
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,037
of 194,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.