You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional connectivity profile of the human inferior frontal junction: involvement in a cognitive control network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-13-119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benedikt Sundermann, Bettina Pfleiderer |
| Abstract |
The human inferior frontal junction area (IFJ) is critically involved in three main component processes of cognitive control (working memory, task switching and inhibitory control). As it overlaps with several areas in established anatomical labeling schemes, it is considered to be underreported as a functionally distinct location in the neuroimaging literature. While recent studies explicitly focused on the IFJ's anatomical organization and functional role as a single brain area, it is usually not explicitly denominated in studies on cognitive networks. However based on few analyses in small datasets constrained by specific a priori assumptions on its functional specialization, the IFJ has been postulated to be part of a cognitive control network. Goal of this meta-analysis was to establish the IFJ's connectivity profile on a high formal level of evidence by aggregating published implicit knowledge about its co-activations. We applied meta-analytical connectivity modeling (MACM) based on the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) method without specific assumptions regarding functional specialization on 180 (reporting left IFJ activity) and 131 (right IFJ) published functional neuroimaging experiments derived from the BrainMap database. This method is based on coordinates in stereotaxic space, not on anatomical descriptors. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 158 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 32% |
| Researcher | 32 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 53 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 36 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,800,441
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#96
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,126
of 172,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.