↓ Skip to main content

Application of discrete choice experiments to estimate value of life: a national study protocol in Iran

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of discrete choice experiments to estimate value of life: a national study protocol in Iran
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12962-021-00259-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Negar Mirzaee, Amirhossein Takian, Farshad Farzadfar, Rajabali Daroudi, Ali Kazemi Karyani, Ali Akbari Sari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Researcher 5 13%
Librarian 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 11%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,876,421
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#102
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,133
of 505,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.