↓ Skip to main content

Formatt: Correcting protein multiple structural alignments by incorporating sequence alignment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Formatt: Correcting protein multiple structural alignments by incorporating sequence alignment
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-259
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noah M Daniels, Shilpa Nadimpalli, Lenore J Cowen

Abstract

The quality of multiple protein structure alignments are usually computed and assessed based on geometric functions of the coordinates of the backbone atoms from the protein chains. These purely geometric methods do not utilize directly protein sequence similarity, and in fact, determining the proper way to incorporate sequence similarity measures into the construction and assessment of protein multiple structure alignments has proved surprisingly difficult.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 9%
United States 2 9%
Sweden 1 5%
Unknown 17 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 27%
Student > Master 3 14%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Mathematics 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2012.
All research outputs
#12,861,953
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,779
of 7,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,686
of 172,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#52
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.