You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes: a 20-year systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized goal-directed trials in major visceral/noncardiac surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03464-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Messina, Chiara Robba, Lorenzo Calabrò, Daniel Zambelli, Francesca Iannuzzi, Edoardo Molinari, Silvia Scarano, Denise Battaglini, Marta Baggiani, Giacomo De Mattei, Laura Saderi, Giovanni Sotgiu, Paolo Pelosi, Maurizio Cecconi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 17 | 18% |
| Spain | 8 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Peru | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#838,948
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#616
of 6,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,233
of 535,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#24
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 535,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.