You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PRimary Care Opioid Use Disorders treatment (PROUD) trial protocol: a pragmatic, cluster-randomized implementation trial in primary care for opioid use disorder treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13722-021-00218-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cynthia I. Campbell, Andrew J. Saxon, Denise M. Boudreau, Paige D. Wartko, Jennifer F. Bobb, Amy K. Lee, Abigail G. Matthews, Jennifer McCormack, David S. Liu, Megan Addis, Andrea Altschuler, Jeffrey H. Samet, Colleen T. LaBelle, Julia Arnsten, Ryan M. Caldeiro, Douglas T. Borst, Angela L. Stotts, Jordan M. Braciszewski, José Szapocznik, Gavin Bart, Robert P. Schwartz, Jennifer McNeely, Jane M. Liebschutz, Judith I. Tsui, Joseph O. Merrill, Joseph E. Glass, Gwen T. Lapham, Sean M. Murphy, Zoe M. Weinstein, Bobbi Jo H. Yarborough, Katharine A. Bradley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 73% |
| Comoros | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,136,731
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#66
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,809
of 526,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.