↓ Skip to main content

A multi-centred randomised trial of radical surgery versus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after local excision for early rectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A multi-centred randomised trial of radical surgery versus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after local excision for early rectal cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12885-016-2557-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. A. A. Borstlap, P. J. Tanis, T. W. A. Koedam, C. A. M. Marijnen, C. Cunningham, E. Dekker, M. E. van Leerdam, G. Meijer, N. van Grieken, I. D. Nagtegaal, C. J. A. Punt, M. G. W. Dijkgraaf, J. H. De Wilt, G. Beets, E. J. de Graaf, A. A. W van Geloven, M. F. Gerhards, H. L. van Westreenen, A. W. H. van de Ven, P. van Duijvendijk, I. H. J. T. de Hingh, J. W. A. Leijtens, C. Sietses, E. J. Spillenaar-Bilgen, R. J. C. L. M. Vuylsteke, C. Hoff, J. W. A. Burger, W. M. U. van Grevenstein, A. Pronk, R. J. I. Bosker, H. Prins, A. B. Smits, S. Bruin, D. D. Zimmerman, L. P. S. Stassen, M. S. Dunker, M. Westerterp, P. P. Coene, J. Stoot, W. A. Bemelman, J. B. Tuynman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Other 12 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 45 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 49 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2021.
All research outputs
#14,979,510
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,210
of 9,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,420
of 381,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#68
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,083 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.