You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants for treating left ventricular thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Thrombosis Journal, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12959-021-00259-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tarun Dalia, Shubham Lahan, Sagar Ranka, Amandeep Goyal, Sara Zoubek, Kamal Gupta, Zubair Shah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 57% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 41% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 33 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,403,485
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#91
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,886
of 538,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 538,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.